I asked a friend, who I went to see the play with, what he thought of it:
"It was a really great example of narrative interpretation. The minimalistic set complimented the abstract movements to really bring to life the humorous, yet dark life of John. I liked the matter of fact style depiction of Johns struggle with the stigma surrounding homosexuality, whilst trying to fulfill his own sexual urges in the 80s. All of this expertly communicated through incredibly creative, yet technically and physically challenging dance pieces really made full impact of ever nuance of the interview."
Why was going to see this play useful for my research?
Why was going to see this play useful for my research?
Press Reviews:
- "Engrossing, elegant. Astonishing physicality"- Time Out
- ''Lloyd Newson tells us John's story through interwined passages or verbatim speech and fluently choreographed movement"- Observer
- "Outstandingly effective and gripping dance theatre. A brilliant performance by Hannes Langolf"-Dagens Nyheter, Sweden
- "You can't leave this performance without being touched by John's life"- Deutschlandfunk, Germany
No comments:
Post a Comment